scholarly journals Total and lipid-associated serum sialic acid levels in cancer patients with different primary sites and differing degrees of metastatic involvement

Cancer ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 2680-2685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Plucinsky ◽  
W. Michael Riley ◽  
Joseph J. Prorok ◽  
Jack A. Alhadeff
2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 344-348
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD JAWAID SABZWARI ◽  
Muhammad Riaz ◽  
MUKHTAR AHMAD ◽  
Muhammad Umair ◽  
MUHAMMAD TAHIR MAJEED

In the world cancer is one of the leading causes of death. Most cancerswhen detected early, can be potentially cured. Thus early laboratory diagnosis of cancer has great importance inmanagement. The tumor markers are one of the methods of cancer management in use today. Objectives: Tocompare serum sialic acid (SA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor markers in different cancer patients.Study Design: Prospective study Setting: Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Lahore. Material and Methods: Onehundred and fifty three (153) documented different cancer patients were studied to compare between serum sialic acidand carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor marker along with fifty controls of matched sex and age distribution between30-85 years. The sialic acid was estimated by colorimetric procedure and carcinoembryonic antigen by EnzymeImmunoassay. Results: The results revealed that mean levels of sialic acid and CEA in cancer patients weresignificantly higher (p<0.05) as compared to controls, considering all malignancies together, or carcinoma,hematological malignancies and sarcoma alone. Statistical analysis showed sialic acid to be more sensitive (p<0.05)than CEA in detection of cancer. Conclusion: Sialic acid was seen to be a good diagnostic indicator as compared toCEA in most cancer patients.


Pharmacology ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. Krolikowski ◽  
K. Reuter ◽  
T.P. Waalkes ◽  
S.M. Sieber ◽  
R.H. Adamson

1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Berra ◽  
Silvana Rapelli ◽  
Gianluigi Monticelli ◽  
Maria Albertina Fighetti ◽  
Ines Della Mea ◽  
...  

Increasing evidence in the literature indicates that serum sialic acid is increased in cancer patients suggesting a possible usefulness of its determination as a tumor marker. However there are many discrepancies in the data reported, probably due to methodological errors, mainly in lipid bound sialic measurement. In this paper we illustrate the results obtained when we applied a method worked out in our laboratory for the determination of total and fractionated sialic acid (lipid and protein bound) to the analysis of sera from patients with ovarian tumors and the preliminary data on the follow up of selected cases. The potential pitfalls in using this relatively new tumor marker will be critically evaluated.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyla Koc Ozturk ◽  
Ebru Emekli-Alturfan ◽  
Emel Kasikci ◽  
Gokhan Demir ◽  
Aysen Yarat

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inayat ur Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Idrees ◽  
Mohammad Salman ◽  
Rooh Ullah Khan ◽  
MI Khan ◽  
...  

Although management of hyperglycaemia represents one of the principal treatment goals of diabetes therapy, the high incidence of cardiovascular (CV) complications in diabetes also needs effective management. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine and compare the effect of glitazones on serum sialic acid (SSA), a known risk marker for CV disease, along with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycohaemoglobin (HbA1-c) and blood lipids, in overweight, previously only diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes ( n=60). The study was conducted for a period of 12 months. Significant improvement in FPG and HbA1-c were shown by both rosiglitazone ( p<0.003 and p<0.001, respectively) and pioglitazone ( p<0.005 and p<0.001, respectively), compared with baseline, and pioglitazone showed greater beneficial effects on other parameters monitored, significantly reducing total cholesterol (TC) ( p≤0.05). Both the drugs showed a decrease in SSA and no significant differences were observed between the groups. However, the decrease was significant only in the pioglitazone-treated group at month 12 ( p≤0.05), compared with baseline. A significant decrease in SSA by pioglitazone indicates its greater cardioprotective effect compared with rosiglitazone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document